What changes in everyday life?
Workers could spend less time on physically dangerous or repetitive tasks.
A robot handles the dangerous repetitive movement while a human worker supervises and makes judgment calls.
A robot handles the dangerous repetitive movement while a human worker supervises and makes judgment calls. Better sensing and controlled human–robot collaboration could change where people need to work near risk. Workers could spend less time on physically dangerous or repetitive tasks. Safety must be designed into the workflow; clever demonstrations are not proof of workplace safety. A worker should not have to risk injury because an essential task is repetitive, heavy or dangerous. Robots are particularly promising when they can take on a hazardous movement while people supervise, make decisions and handle exceptions. The opportunity is better work, not merely fewer workers. Machines must be designed around actual workplace hazards rather than impressive demonstrations.
Workers could spend less time on physically dangerous or repetitive tasks.
Safety must be designed into the workflow; clever demonstrations are not proof of workplace safety.
This is an opportunity we're exploring, not a promise that the complete result is already available. The research below explains the difference.
This idea comes from the Yottabit research foundation's Opportunity Atlas. It is a proposed application rather than a quantified forecast or evidence of a broadly deployed product.
What would demonstrate real progress? A useful result that works reliably outside a demonstration, withstands appropriate testing and improves an outcome people care about.